Mention it once. Everyone's already aligned.
The bottleneck isn't your tools — it's that you're still the one routing between them.
Engineering · Linear
Product · HiveBase
Your AI · ClaudeEvery claim is a record — not a line of text.
A brain doc reads like Markdown. Underneath, each claim carries its evidence grade, its source, how fresh it is — and any conflict, held for review, never overwritten.
Our largest enterprise account — ARR $86k, renewing 2026-09-30. Expansion is stalled pending their security review.
Enterprise SSO blocks the renewal — their security team won't sign without it. The champion confirmed this on the Jun 3 call.
Okta ships native SSO next quarter, raising switching risk on SSO-gated deals.
No record stands alone. Context spans all of them.
Records link into one graph — so the full picture lives in the connections. Ask anything and the answer is assembled across records, every claim still sourced.
- Acme Corpgated bySSO / SCIM
- OktathreatensSSO / SCIM
- SSO / SCIMdepends onAuth refactor
- Ship SSO · Q2prioritizesSSO / SCIM
Acme's $86k renewal won't close without SSO, Okta already ships it, and the auth refactor it hinges on is ~2 weeks behind — which is exactly why SSO was pulled into Q2.
Ask any AI the same question. Get the same answer.
Every AI you run reads the one trusted record — no re-explaining your company to each.
It spends like you would. You pay when your company changes — not when it talks.
Routine work runs on cheap open-source models; frontier models step in only when the call is hard enough to earn it. And reads are always free.
Monitoring, daily briefs, standard chat, meeting notes — always 0 credits
Bring your own API key. Your keys, your model, your cost.
Route work to the cheapest model that can do it — determinism before inference
Cost scales with how much your company changes, not how much it talks
Frequently asked questions
How does HiveBase handle information that goes out of date?
Every claim carries a freshness state. When something changes, the newer fact supersedes the older one — but the record isn't silently overwritten; the prior version stays visible until the update is confirmed.
What happens when two sources disagree in HiveBase's company context?
The conflict is held for review, not resolved automatically in either direction. Each claim keeps its own evidence grade and source, so contradictions surface for a human to settle instead of one version quietly winning.
Do Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and my other AI tools see the same company context?
Yes. Every AI app you connect reads from the same underlying record — the same company Brain — so no tool gets a stale or different answer than another.
Take yourself out of the loop.
Connect your first tool and watch one mention cascade. Reads are always free.
Context is the entry. Action is the point — see how work runs on it → /tasks